Home

         Back

Psy 300. Personal Decision Making

Final Examination

A satisfactory answer to each question is given in blue italics, along with the percentage of students who most recently received perfect scores on that question.

1. Name the three secrets of wise decision making, and indicate the warning signs and correctives associated with each.  15 points

Name of “Secret”

Warning Signs

Correctives

 

The Courage to be Rational (100%)

 

Emotionality, procrastinating, shifting responsibility, bolstering a favored alternative (60%)

Process orientation, hope,  observer  perspective (37%)

 

Creativity (97%)

 

 

No ideas or the same ideas over and over again (51%)

Stimulus variation + force fit (57%)

 

Balanced Judgment (94%)

 

Feeling overwhelmed, vacillation, oversimplification (37%)

External memory, heuristics, decomposition (26%)

 

2.  Name two techniques for varying stimuli in order to think creatively specifically about values, two specifically for alternatives, and two that are more general. 6 points

To think of:

Vary stimuli in this way

 

Values

 

 

Analysis of stakeholders

Analysis of alternatives

Value tree (74%)

 

Alternatives

 

 

Analysis of values

Analyses of causes

Analysis of resources (46%)

 

General

 

 

Observation

Creative Conversation

Taking a break (63%)

 

3. For each of the criteria for a value set, provide a one-sentence question to test against that criterion.  6 points

Criterion

Test (one-sentence question)

 

Completeness

 

If all my alternatives were alike with respect to all the values currently in my value set, would I be willing to toss a coin to choose among them?  (43%)

 

Relevance

 

Do the alternatives differ substantially with respect to each value?  (60%)

 

Non-redundancy

 

Do any of the values overlap in meaning?  (60%)

 

Testability/Measurability

 

Are all my values specified with sufficient clarity that someone else could fill in my fact table?  (66%)

 

Meaningfulness

 

Do my measures reflect what is really important to me about the values they measure?  (37%)

 

Value Independence

 

Can I assign +s and -s (ordinal independence) and 1-to-10 ratings (interval independence) to each value without having to think about the other values?  (34%)

 

4. Draw a line through each alternative that is dominated. 3 points (51%)

 

Value A

Value B

Value C

Value D

Value E

Alternative 1

+

+

+

+

-

Alternative 2

-

-

-

-

+

Alternative 3

+

+

+

+

0

 

5. Circle the cell in the above table that you would focus on in order to try to create an  alternative that dominates all others.  3 points (54%)

6. Which of the four Total Values is most likely to be incorrect?  (Hint:  This doesn’t require any calculation.)  3 points (74%)

 

Value A

Value B

Value C

Value D

Total Value

 

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

1.0

Alternative 1

1

2

10

3

3.3

Alternative 2

10

10

1

3

7.5

Alternative 3

10

8

7

1

11.4

Alternative 4

7

1

5

10

5.1

 

7. Circle the two numbers out of the six in the ranges 3-7, 1-5, and 6-8 that would be the most important ones to test in a sensitivity analysis.  4 points (43%)

 

0.5

0.2

0.2

0.1

 

Alternative 1

10

3-7

1

6

6.8

Alternative 2

1

10

3

1-5

3.4

Alternative 3

10

1

6-8

10

7.6

Alternative 4

4

5

10

1

5.1

 

8. Indicate in the space below what you could do if either of these tests showed the decision to be sensitive to the range of uncertainty involved.  6 points (11%)

 

Try uncertainty proofing with respect to the critical uncertainty (exercise control, obtain information, keep options open, diversify, share risk).

 

Failing that, represent the critical uncertainty as an event node in a decision tree, and compute expected value.

 

9. When is it not wise to pick the alternative with the highest value?  4 points (6%)

When it fails the universalizability test and may be morally wrong.